I was looking at the state of OS Licences (IANAL)
and concluded that it would be useful to the
OS community if the BCS itself operated an OS Licence.
If it good enough for the The Regents of the University of California,
then why not for the BCS itself?
1) Open Source licencing has matured. The principles and pitfalls
are better understood. The BCS can offer a good licence.
2) The BCS can offer protection from a perceived problem with
current licences – the ability to transfer copyright and then
revoke the openness (Estoppel not withstanding).
3) The BCS would be an ideal home for the copyright for national UK
OS projects e.g. Health, Local Government, Defence, Transport.
1) The BCS charter may prevent it.
2) The BCS board may not like it.
Both disadvantages are not immutable, though they may take time to resolve.